Feedback to Seminar
添加問卷說明
1. How often did you attend the Friday afternoon seminars?
Almost every time.
Over 60% of the times.
< 60% of the times.
I am a ≥ 4th year student and I attended a couple of seminars.
2. Did you attend all talks after signing in to the course?
Yes.
No, I sometimes skipped the last or first talk.
I sometimes left the room, immediately after signing in.
I am a ≥ 4th year student and only attended those talks that interested me.
3. Did you find the talks informative?
Most of them.
Some of them.
Primarily those in my own field.
Mostly not.
4. Overall, do you consider the student seminar useful?
Yes. It enriches my scientific horizon and improves my presentation skills.
Yes. But I only found those talks in my own field.
No. I would rather spend my time on my own research.
No. I actually was spending most of the time on my laptop and did not pay much attention to the talks.
5. Did you find this semester’s structure (arXiv discussion on self-selected papers) an improvement compared to previous year’s?
Yes.
No.
Neutral.
I cannot make this comparison, because I did not attend any talks in past formats.
6. Would you like to explain your answer for Question 5?
7. Do you think the quality of the presentations has been improving as the course progresses?
Yes. Significantly improved.
Yes. Slightly improved.
No. The scatter is much larger than the trend.
No. Nothing evolved.
8. Which aspects in the new structure could be improved?
The 1 week “selection period” is too tight. Please, relax it.
It would be better to have dual presentations, rather than the chair/presenter format.
The selection of preprint articles should be pre-approved and/or discussed with a faculty member (because sometimes the selected papers are not appropriate)
I want to select my teammate myself.
Others.
9. Would you like to explain your answer for Question 8?
10. Did you find the venue (E225) adequate?
Yes. I can easily follow the talks, even when I sit at a distance.
No. I cannot quite follow the talks when I was in the back of the room.
I don’t care.
11. How would you qualify the teachers for this course?
Positive (professional, …).
Negative (perhaps you can tell why).
They were rather invisible.
Others.
12. Would you like to explain your answer for Question 11?
13. How did you experience the review feedback you had to write?
a. Quite useful. Writing critical, constructive comments is a good practice for me.
b. Like (a) but it took me too much time.
c. I don't think it's very useful. I don't see the point to "criticize" my colleagues more than necessary
d. Writing such "independent" reviews takes me too much effort. Luckily we have DeepSeek now.
14. Was the written feedback that you received from your fellow students and teachers helpful?
Very helpful. It highlighted some aspects of my presentation I was not aware of.
Helpful. Feedback is always useful to have.
Rather unhelpful. The feedback was too severe. It destroyed my self confidence.
Others.
15. Would you like to explain your answer for Question 14?
16. Any other suggestions that you would like to give us in order to improve the format?
關(guān)閉
更多問卷
復(fù)制此問卷